Closing the Office for Two Weeks: A Low-Risk Way to Test Remote Work
Not sure a business can run without a shared space? Skip the debate and run a short experiment. Here is what to measure, what to change and how to decide afterwards.
Many small business owners treat the office question as a debate: remote work is the future, or remote work does not suit us. Both sides sound convincing, and neither tells you what will happen in your business, with your people and your clients.
A better move is to stop arguing and run a test. Close the shared space for two weeks, watch what happens and let the results decide. A test is cheap, reversible and honest. Here is how to run a good one.
Start with the question, not the answer
"Should we go remote?" is too vague to test. Turn it into something you can observe. Ask what you actually hope to gain and what you are afraid of losing.
- Do you want lower fixed costs?
- Do you want to hire people from anywhere?
- Do you want fewer interruptions?
- Are you worried about slower answers, weaker teamwork or clients who feel less looked after?
Write down three hopes and three fears. They become the things you check at the end.
Pick the right two weeks
Do not run the test during a launch, a crisis or a holiday week. You want a normal stretch, with real work and real deadlines. If a client has a big deliverable coming, your experiment will be blamed for every hiccup, fairly or not.
Also say clearly that it is a trial. People behave differently when they know the old arrangement can return. Some will relax. Others will try harder to make it work. Both reactions are useful to you.
Set up the basics before day one
Most remote trials fail from missing basics, not from the idea itself. Before you start, check each of these:
- A place to talk. Choose one chat tool for quick questions and one way to hold calls. Decide which topics belong where.
- A single list of work. Everyone should see who is doing what and by when. If this lives only in people's heads, remote work exposes it fast.
- Shared files in one spot. No more "it is on my desktop".
- Agreed hours of overlap. People can work flexibly, but a few shared hours let you reach each other.
- Client contact. Decide who answers client messages and how fast.
Decide what you will measure
Feelings matter, but pair them with something you can count. For each hope and fear, choose a simple measure.
- Speed: how long it takes for a question to get an answer.
- Delivery: how many tasks finished on time compared with a normal fortnight.
- Clients: whether anyone complained or seemed less happy.
- Mood: a short, honest check-in with each person at the end of each week.
- Money: what it cost to run the trial, including tools, equipment and travel.
Keep a simple log. A shared note with a few lines per day is enough.
Be honest about the money
People often assume that no office means big savings. It might, but not always. You save on rent and utilities, then you spend on better headsets, a faster connection, software subscriptions and the occasional trip to get everyone together. Add these up in the same way you add up rent.
It also helps to look at how the shift changes your income side. If your team works from several places, your invoicing and payment follow-up should not depend on someone being at a particular desk. Invoices that go out from a shared tool, with automatic reminders and a record of when a client opened them, mean billing carries on whoever is online. TickPaid is built for this kind of work, since everything lives on the web and a client can open an invoice from a link without an account.
Watch for the quiet problems
Some trouble does not show up in the numbers. Look out for these during the two weeks:
- A person who used to ask questions out loud and now says nothing.
- New starters who cannot find anyone to learn from.
- Work that stalls because one person was the unofficial answer to everything.
- People who never switch off because the laptop is always right there.
Not every issue means remote work fails. Many just mean you need a habit: a short daily call, a written handover, a rule about evenings. Note each problem and whether a small change fixed it.
Different jobs, different results
Not all work behaves the same way. Tasks that need deep concentration, like writing, design or analysis, often go better with fewer interruptions. Work that depends on quick back and forth, hands-on equipment or training someone new may suffer. You may find that a hybrid setup suits you best: a few shared days and the rest apart.
Look at your trial results by type of work rather than as one average. The answer may be "yes for these roles, not yet for those".
Make the decision together
At the end of the two weeks, sit down with your notes and the people involved. Walk through your hopes and fears one by one. Where did the experience match them and where did it surprise you?
Then choose one of three paths:
- Go back to the shared space, and keep any habits that helped.
- Go hybrid, with agreed days together and days apart.
- Go fully remote and review again after a few months.
Whatever you pick, set a date to review it. Work changes, teams change and the right answer today may not be the right one in a year.
What if it is only you?
The same test works if you are a solo freelancer deciding whether to give up a rented desk. Work from home for two weeks, track your focus, mood and costs, and see whether you miss the space or the people. Often the people matter more than the walls, and a weekly coffee or a shared desk day gives you that without the monthly rent.
Either way, you are replacing a guess with evidence. That is the whole point: a small, honest experiment will tell you more than any opinion, including your own.
From the team
Tickpaid